Skip to main content

Complex (Organised and Multiple) Abuse

1. Introduction

Complex (organised or multiple) abuse isĀ  abuse involving one or more abusers and number of children (who may be related or non-related).

The abusers concerned may be acting in concert to abuse a child or children, or may be acting in isolation. One or more of the adults involved may be using an institutional framework or position of authority to recruit children for abuse.

The following factors may make a case complex:

  • Multiple offenders;
  • Multiple (actual or potential) victims;
  • Particular victim vulnerabilities;
  • Environment, e.g. institution, establishment, club, group, internet-based;
  • Number of scenes or locations;
  • Length of time between the offences and the report;
  • Alleged offending occurring over a long period of time.

Such abuse is often reported a long time after the offending took place.

Children living away from home (including foster care, residential care, private fostering, health settings, residential schools, prisons, young offender institutions and secure units) may be particularly vulnerable to child abuse.

Complex abuse investigations will encompass not only the reporting of current abuse on children, but also the reporting of childhood abuse by adults, commonly referred to as non recent abuse. See also Non Recent (Historical) Abuse Procedure.

Cases of organised abuse are often highly complex because of the number of children involved, the very serious nature of the allegations of abuse, the need for therapeutic input and the complex and time consuming nature of any consequent legal proceedings.

Each investigation is different and complex abuse may occur in day care, in families and in other provisions such as youth services, sports clubs and voluntary groups. Being abused by the use of the internet is also a form of complex abuse. See also Online Safety Procedure.

Complex abuse investigations require thorough planning and may require the formation of dedicated teams of professionals from both the Police and Doncaster Children’s Services Trust for the purpose of the investigation.

It is recognised those who commit sex offences against children often operate across geographical and operational boundaries and require the involvement of more than one local authority/Police Force area.

In all investigations of organised abuse, it is essential that staff involved maintain a high level of confidentiality in relation to the information in their possession without jeopardising the investigation or the welfare of the children involved.

The protection of any children identified as suffering or likely to suffer Significant Harm remains paramount, but the needs of the alleged offender should be treated with sensitivity and the investigation should aim to minimise the disruption and damage to the alleged offender’s private and professional life.

Subsequent information generated throughout the investigation should only be shared on a 'need to know' basis.

These procedures must be implemented in conjunction with the Responding to Allegations Against Staff, Carers or Volunteers Procedure where appropriate.

For further guidance see College of Policing: Managing Complex Child Abuse Investigations.

2. Response

Where there is a suspicion of complex abuse, the Social Worker or Police Officer receiving the referral should immediately inform their line manager.

If managers agree that the referral constitutes a complex abuse allegation, the senior child protection manager and the detective chief inspector should be informed and consulted.

Investigations of complex abuse will be carried out under the auspices of the Doncaster Safeguarding Children Partnership, and the Partnership should be kept informed of its progress.

3. Scoping Strategy Meeting

In order to assist the decision whether a complex abuse investigation is commenced, there should be a ‘scoping’ meeting involving the:

  • Head of Service Children’s Safeguarding and Standards Unit, or their nominee;
  • Police Detective Chief Inspector, or their nominee;
  • Senior managers from any other agency with information to assist in determining the scale of the enquiry, including the referring agency.

The meeting needs to take account of the likely impact on the victim/s, the suspected offender/s and the community in deciding whether the investigation or any course of action, is proportionate to the aim.

Factors to be considered include the:

  • Extent or seriousness of the abuse (potential and actual numbers involved; the complexity of the circumstances; seriousness of injury or abuse; strength of public concern/feeling; the affect upon the community);
  • Context in which the abuse occurred (degree of organisation; ritual; paedophile ring; access to children; employer/volunteer; school, nursery or other institution).

The scoping meeting must:

  • Assess the information known to date;
  • Decide what further information is required at this stage;
  • Arrange for its gathering;
  • Establish whether, and to what extent, complex abuse has been uncovered;
  • Undertake an initial mapping exercise to determine the scale of the investigation and possible individuals implicated;
  • Consider any immediate protective action required;
  • Consider a plan for the investigation to be presented to the Strategic Management Group, including resource implications, if a complex investigation is initiated.

If the meeting decides that the case is likely to be sufficiently complex and resource intensive, then a full meeting of the Strategic Management Group should be convened.

If the case does not meet this threshold, then the investigation will be managed under the normal arrangements described. If, after further enquiries are made, it becomes clear that the situation is more complex, the scoping meeting should be re-convened.

Where the extent of the complexity is unclear, there should be a further scoping meeting arranged to review the progress of the case.

4. Professionals Who Need to be Informed

Once the decision has been taken at the scoping meeting to initiate a complex investigation, the lead officer for  the Doncaster Children’s Services Trust must be informed. They will inform the Doncaster Safeguarding Children Partnership, the Director of Children’s Services, head of the media / press office and senior managers of relevant agencies e.g. designated child protection professionals.

5. Strategic Management Group

To ensure a co-ordinated response, a Strategic Management Group (SMG) meeting, chaired by either Doncaster Children’s Services Trust or the Police, must be convened as early as possible. The agency initiating the meeting will provide the administrative support.

The membership of the group should comprise senior staff able to commit resources and will normally include the following:

  • Lead officer for Children’s Services Trust or nominee;
  • Assistant Chief Police Officer or nominee;
  • Police senior investigating officer (SIO);
  • Senior child protection manager or nominee;
  • Senior legal adviser (local authority);
  • Crown Prosecution Service;
  • Assistant director education department or nominee;
  • Senior health representative;
  • Press officer;
  • Other individuals and agencies as appropriate.

Line managers of any staff implicated in the allegations of abuse must not be included in the Strategic Management Group or the investigation team.

The terms of reference of the SMG should be minuted at the first meeting.

All subsequent meetings held in accordance with this procedure must be minuted, classified as ‘confidential’ and all copies individually numbered. Any copying of minutes should be agreed with the chairperson.

The minutes should be arranged in the following format:

  • Time, date, location of the meeting;
  • Persons present;
  • Apologies;
  • Details of all individuals subject of the enquiry (Genogram);
  • Facts and circumstances known to date;
  • Identified actions;
  • Parameters of investigation;
  • Terms of reference;
  • Resources and management issues;
  • Media issues;
  • Miscellaneous;
  • Exit strategy;
  • Date of next meeting.

Decisions and explanatory reasoning should be recorded in the policy book, a document used by the senior investigating officer to record strategic and tactical decisions, who should also ensure the production of an action list for subsequent monitoring purposes.

The meeting must consider a wide range of issues and agree a plan that includes:

  • A decision on the scale of the investigation and the staff required for a joint investigation group;
  • Focus of investigation: protection versus prosecution & what will and what will not be investigated;
  • Any cross boundary issues and planning of appropriate liaison and sharing of resources - see Section 10, Crossing Geographical and Operational Boundaries and Children and Families Moving Across Boundaries Procedure;
  • Identification of staff to manage the investigative process (usually the child protection team DI and Senior Manager from Children’s Services Trust);
  • Identification of sufficient trained staff for the investigation (see Section 6, Investigation Management Group);
  • Organisation of adequate accommodation including a dedicated major incident room and facilities for interviewing and recording interviews;
  • Arrangements for medical staff to conduct assessments;
  • Arrangements for sufficient administrative staff and information technology resources to support the investigation;
  • Proper legal advice including consultation with the CPS, litigation and any other legal implications;
  • Sufficient resources to ensure that children are protected from further abuse and that their welfare remains paramount (this should include appropriate foster, day-care or residential placements, medical, therapeutic, educational and practical services);
  • Support for victims / survivors;
  • Child witness support, if relevant;
  • Sufficient support, supervision and de-briefing of staff involved;
  • Availability of expert advice where necessary;
  • Liaison arrangements for inter-agency working;
  • Time scales for the stages of the investigation;
  • Allocation of specific tasks to personnel involved in the investigation together with line management responsibilities;
  • Management of public relations and media interest in the case;
  • Management of political arena;
  • Confidentiality/need to know arrangements;
  • Disclosure policy/information sharing - see also Information Sharing Procedure;
  • Professional association interest (e.g. Unison);
  • Free phone application - helpline for victims/information line;
  • Issues around financial compensation for victims;
  • Exit strategy;
  • Safety/security of records and appointment of disclosure officer.

The SMG must ensure that any current risks to children are acted upon immediately, whenever they emerge during the investigation and should consider developing a risk management protocol.

The SMG must make arrangements to convene regularly during the investigation to:

  • Monitor the progress, quality and integrity of the investigation;
  • Review risk indicators for the children involved;
  • Consider resource requirements;
  • Consider the appropriate timing of the termination of the investigation;
  • Plan a de-brief meeting with the investigation management group to identify lessons learnt.

The SMG should remain in existence at least until the Crown Prosecution Service has made a decision about the alleged perpetrators.

The SMG must inform the DoncasterĀ  Safeguarding Children Partnership of the investigation and consideration given to the need for a Serious Case Review.

6. Investigation Management Group

This group led by the Police Senior Investigating Officer or her/his deputy should include representatives of Doncaster Children’s Services Trust, education, health and local authority legal services. Other agencies should be invited as appropriate.

The role of this group will vary, but should include:

  • A forum for the exchange of information, tactics and strategy, and to monitor the progress of the investigation;
  • Ensuring consistent strategy for interviewing victims;
  • Updating the SMG of the progress of the investigation;
  • Updating the SMG on any resource shortages;
  • Ensuring consistent support for victims and their families;
  • Maintaining support for investigation team staff;
  • Sharing information with agencies not represented on SMG;
  • Ensuring compliance by the investigation team of policy and parameters set with regard to information sharing and confidentiality - See Section 9, Information Sharing and Information Sharing Procedure;
  • Ensuring cross-flow of intelligence between agencies and the Police major incident room;
  • Setting policy.

7. Investigation Team

The SMG should identify individuals within and outside their organisation with the required expertise. This may include experience of investigating allegations of abuse, compiling profiles, understanding methods of abusers, child protection processes, disciplinary proceedings and working with victims, survivors and their families.

In selecting staff, consideration should be given to requirements arising from the individual needs of the relevant child/ren - e.g. gender, culture, race, language, and where relevant, disability.

The team members must be trustworthy and display sensitivity, honesty, empathy and personal maturity. They must all be wholly independent from any of the parties that are the subjects of the investigation.

Personnel seconded to the investigative team should be dedicated to the investigation and have no other responsibility.

The location of the group must take account, both geographically and organisationally, of the need to maintain confidentiality, especially crucial where the investigation concerns staff or carers.

Appropriate facilities must be available for video interviews and paediatric assessment.

Administrative support, information technology and accommodation requirements must be addressed at the outset, including the storage of confidential records.

8. Access to Records

One of the most difficult issues in complex abuse investigations relates to the tracing, use, management and disclosure of documentary information relevant to the investigation. The investigative team should consider what information is required and where it is likely to be, and take immediate steps to secure it within each agency.

A vast range of documentary information will exist on personal files, personnel files, e-mails, general establishment records and registers. Clear protocols and procedures for investigative access to this material will need to be established at an early stage.

Where vital information may have been lost, damaged or destroyed over a period of time, consideration should be given to the establishment of a database containing details of known or potential witnesses and victims.

9. Information Sharing

These investigations rely critically on sensitive or highly confidential information being made available, including any information known about alleged perpetrators identified in the investigation. The principles of Information Sharing should be applied to all complex abuse investigations and team members should be familiar with its provisions. See Information Sharing Procedure.

The need to maintain the integrity of shared information is vital, and all investigative staff must be aware and comply with the principle of a ‘need to know basis’. Consideration should be given to the use of confidentiality agreements with regard to individuals employed to undertake the investigation.

In addition to the issues regarding access to files and information sharing, consideration must be given for the need to share information about any known or suspected offender identified in the investigation.

Whenever a statement of complaint is received in respect of an alleged perpetrator, a risk assessment must be immediately undertaken with regard to what current risk that person may pose to other young children.

Members of the investigation team should not undertake this task, but ensure that the appropriate information is shared with the multi-agency risk panel situated in the area where it is believed the perpetrator is currently residing.

10. Crossing Geographical and Operational Boundaries

It may be recognised at the outset, or during the investigation, that there are suspected or potential victims in more than one geographical area.

At the outset, the responsibility for managing the investigation lies with Doncaster Children’s Services Trust where the abuse is alleged to have occurred/where the alleged perpetrator/s are alleged to operate.

Once it is recognised that there are suspected or potential victims in other areas a joint approach should be made by the SMG to the appropriate and Children’s Social Care Services

The initiating investigation management group and investigation team should undertake the investigation on behalf of the other geographical areas.

A senior manager from each area should join the initiating SMG to discuss this and agree any resource implications involved.

If the number of victims outside the geographical boundaries of the original joint investigative team increases to the extent that it cannot respond, then an investigation management group and/or an investigation team in the new geographic area should be established.

It is essential that there is a joint SMG to provide overall planning. If it is necessary to have more than one investigative team, there must be close working between co-ordinators and processes for full information sharing.

11. Closure

There must be a clearly defined exit strategy not only in relation to the closure of the investigation, but also with regard to the victims and witnesses, who may require on-going support at the conclusion of any trial or investigation.

Staff involved directly in the investigation as well as other operational staff who have kept day to day services running where colleagues have been seconded into the investigation team, need to be thoroughly debriefed.

At the conclusion of the investigation each agency should undertake a review, with a view to identifying any changes to policy, practice or disciplinary processes that may be necessary. Such a review will complement any Serious Case Review / Child Safeguarding Practice Review that may be concurrent or have been completed.

The SMG should have a final meeting where concluding information and debriefing can be shared. An overview report should be compiled and presented to the Doncaster Safeguarding Children Partnership.

Consideration must also be given to the storage and security of the files relating to the investigation. Access to such records may well be necessary in relation to any on-going appeals, civil proceedings or applications for compensation.

Best practice is for the files to be centrally archived at a single location, and retained for a minimum period of 6 years from the completion of the investigation, or six months beyond the completion of any sentence, whichever is the longer.

Trix procedures

Only valid for 48hrs